DETAILED COMPARISON

Side-by-Side Analysis

📑 QUICK NAVIGATION

💭 Design Philosophy 🗂️ Data Models ⚙️ CREATE Operation 📖 READ Operation 🔍 SEARCH Operation ⚡ Performance 🎯 When to Use Each 🏢 Real-World Analogy

💭 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY

COBOL

Era: 1959 - Mainframe Computing

Approach: Imperative & Procedural

Philosophy: "Tell the computer EXACTLY what to do, step by step"

Control: Complete control over every operation

Focus: Business data processing, batch jobs

SQL

Era: 1974 - Relational Revolution

Approach: Declarative & Set-Based

Philosophy: "Describe WHAT you want, not HOW to get it"

Control: Database optimizer makes decisions

Focus: Structured data, transactions, consistency

MONGODB

Era: 2009 - Web Scale Era

Approach: Document-Oriented & Flexible

Philosophy: "Developer-friendly, evolving schema"

Control: Balance of power and flexibility

Focus: Rapid development, horizontal scalability

🗂️ DATA MODELS

COBOL: Fixed Records

01  EMPLOYEE-RECORD.
    05 EMP-ID               PIC X(4).
    05 EMP-FIRST-NAME       PIC X(20).
    05 EMP-LAST-NAME        PIC X(20).
    05 EMP-DEPARTMENT       PIC X(15).
    05 EMP-SALARY           PIC 9(7)V99.
    05 EMP-HIRE-DATE        PIC X(10).

* Every record = EXACTLY 78 bytes
* Fixed at compile time
* No optional fields
* Change requires recompilation

SQL: Tables with Schema

CREATE TABLE employees (
    id          VARCHAR(4) PRIMARY KEY,
    first_name  VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
    last_name   VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL,
    department  VARCHAR(15) NOT NULL,
    salary      DECIMAL(9,2) CHECK (salary >= 0),
    hire_date   DATE NOT NULL
);

-- Constraints enforced
-- Nullable vs NOT NULL
-- Change via ALTER TABLE

MongoDB: Flexible Documents

{
    _id: "E001",
    firstName: "John",
    lastName: "Smith",
    department: "Engineering",
    salary: 85000,
    hireDate: ISODate("2020-01-15"),
    skills: ["Java", "Python"],     // Optional!
    contact: {                       // Nested!
        email: "[email protected]"
    }
}

// Each document can differ
// No fixed schema
// Add fields anytime

⚙️ CREATE OPERATION

Aspect COBOL SQL MongoDB
Lines of Code 11 lines 2 lines 7 lines
Approach Field-by-field assignment Single INSERT statement JSON-like object
Error Handling Manual file status checks Automatic constraint validation Schema validation (optional)
Flexibility Fixed structure only Must match table schema Can add extra fields

📖 READ OPERATION

COBOL (9 lines)

OPEN INPUT EMPLOYEE-FILE.
MOVE "E001" TO EMP-ID.
READ EMPLOYEE-FILE
    KEY IS EMP-ID.
IF WS-SUCCESS
    DISPLAY EMP-FIRST-NAME
ELSE IF WS-NOT-FOUND
    DISPLAY "Not found"
END-IF.
CLOSE EMPLOYEE-FILE.

Manual file management required

SQL (2 lines)

SELECT first_name, last_name
FROM employees
WHERE id = 'E001';

Database handles everything

MongoDB (1 line)

db.employees.findOne(
    { _id: "E001" }
)

Simple method call

🔍 SEARCH OPERATION

"Find all Engineering employees earning over $80,000"

COBOL Approach: Sequential Scan

PERFORM UNTIL WS-EOF
    READ EMPLOYEE-FILE NEXT RECORD
        AT END SET WS-EOF TO TRUE
        NOT AT END
            IF EMP-DEPARTMENT = "Engineering"
                AND EMP-SALARY > 80000
                DISPLAY EMP-ID " - " EMP-FIRST-NAME
            END-IF
    END-READ
END-PERFORM.

✓ Complete control
✗ Must scan entire file
✗ Manual loop logic

SQL Approach: Declarative Query

SELECT id, first_name, last_name, salary
FROM employees
WHERE department = 'Engineering'
  AND salary > 80000
ORDER BY salary DESC;

✓ Concise syntax
✓ Automatic optimization
✓ Index usage

MongoDB Approach: Query Document

db.employees.find({
    department: "Engineering",
    salary: { $gt: 80000 }
}).sort({ salary: -1 })

✓ Rich operators
✓ Chainable methods
✓ Automatic index usage

⚡ PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS

Aspect COBOL SQL MongoDB
Sequential Scan Excellent Good Good
Indexed Lookup Very Fast Very Fast Very Fast
Complex Joins Manual (multiple files) Excellent Limited ($lookup)
Aggregation Manual calculation Optimized Good (pipeline)
Memory Usage Minimal Moderate Higher
Scalability Vertical only Vertical (+ sharding) Horizontal (native)

🎯 WHEN TO USE EACH

Use COBOL When:

  • ✅ Working with legacy mainframe systems
  • ✅ Batch processing huge files overnight
  • ✅ Need predictable, deterministic processing
  • ✅ Fixed record formats are appropriate
  • ❌ Need flexible schema
  • ❌ Building modern web applications

Use SQL When:

  • ✅ Data has clear relational structure
  • ✅ Need ACID guarantees
  • ✅ Complex JOIN operations required
  • ✅ Data integrity is critical
  • ❌ Need horizontal scalability
  • ❌ Schema changes frequently

Use MongoDB When:

  • ✅ Schema evolves rapidly
  • ✅ Need horizontal scalability
  • ✅ Working with nested/hierarchical data
  • ✅ Developer productivity is priority
  • ❌ Need complex multi-document transactions
  • ❌ Heavy relational queries with JOINs

🏢 REAL-WORLD ANALOGY

Manual Filing Cabinet

Walk to cabinet → Open drawer → Flip through folders → Read documents → Make notes → Close drawer

Total control, but labor-intensive

Personal Librarian

Tell librarian what you want → Librarian finds optimal way → Librarian brings exactly what you asked for

Efficient, but within library rules

Smart Digital Assistant

Describe data in natural structure → Assistant handles storage flexibly → Can reorganize on the fly

Flexible and modern, less rigid structure

📚 EXPLORE DEEPER INSIGHTS

Ready to dive deeper into real-world patterns and hard truths about these technologies?

🚨 Anti-Pattern Warning

Learn about the common mistake of implementing COBOL-style sequential scanning in MongoDB, and how to avoid building a "distributed COBOL mainframe."

VIEW ANTI-PATTERNS →

💎 Hard Truths

Discover why each technology still matters in 2024, and learn to match the tool to the problem rather than following trends.

READ CONCLUSIONS →

📚 EXPLORE MORE

🏠 HOME 📖 INTRODUCTION 💻 EXAMPLES 🚨 ANTI-PATTERNS 💎 CONCLUSIONS